UPGMA dendrogram based on combining data grouped 32
S. rotunda
accessions into five different groups at 76.2% similarity. Cluster I
contained 22
accessions including 1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, 18, 20, 23,
28, 29, 30, 31, 21, 19, 24, and 27. Cluster II had two accessions 11
and 12. Cluster III comprised accessions 25 and 26. Cluster IV had
only one accession 32. Cluster V consisted of five accessions including
6, 7, 9, 10, and 8 (Fig 4).
The Mantel test and Pearson's correlation (
r
) exhibited a moderate
coefficient of 0.543 (p<0.0001) between ISSR and RAPD markers
whereas genetic matrics of RAPD or ISSR makers and integrated data
showed a strong correlation with
r
= 0.930 and 0.814 (p<0.0001),
respectively (Table 4). The results indicated that the efficiency of
genetic variation analysis of RAPD to 32
S. rotunda
accessions is
higher than that of ISSR.
Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the combined RAPD and
ISSR data displayed the genetic relationships of
S. rotunda
accessions
in two-dimensional space accounted for 45.71% and 17.17% of the
total genetic varia difference. The PCA data separated 32
S. rotunda
into major clusters that appeared similar to the tree diagram
generated from the cluster analysis (Fig 5). Accessions 1, 12, 11, 13, 5,
14, 15, 3, 4, and 2 were grouped into one cluster whereas accessions
16, 19, 17, 21, 23, 18, 30, 31, 22, 29, 28, and 20 were in the same
cluster. Accessions 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 were gathered together in one
cluster, and accessions 24, 25, 26, and 27 were in one group.
Unsurprisingly, accession 32 was isolated into one group from the
remaining accessions (Fig 5).